Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Topsy M. Durham on July 9, 2009 at 2:38pm

I think nominations should be separated by
1. COMPOSER/PERFORMERS
2. PERFORMERS
3. each year dedicated to a Jazz Composer trailblazer pioneer.

I don't appreciate when a Performer wins a "Grammy" over runner up Composer/Performers, especially if the Performer is doing mostly "covers", or when the Awards event is dedicated, for example, to Dizzy and not to Roy Eldridge, or worse, to a non-American! Though appreciated worldwide - JAZZ and BLUES ORIGINATED IN AMERICA.

I also think nominees should be limited to U.S. born and bred for at least the first decade; and voting open to worldwide members who should join at levels beginning at a small fee, say $10. and members volunteer at the annual event (like IAJE, rest in Peace!).

www.DurhamJazz.com

Permalink Reply by Jeri Gardiner on July 9, 2009 at 6:45pm

Hey Topsy,

I agree with you about separating performers/composers from performers. Also, about a special award each year to a composer trailblazer. I don't know how we would handle a situation if some of the musicians were born in Africa, Puerto Rico or other islands. They too are part of the African diaspora and also carry the Legacy. We can solve the problem of keeping the perpetrators out by going by artistic talent and not by commercial success. If we go by artisitc value, this will give us the opportunity to recognize the small independent labels that are owned by many musicians. Do we need an organization to sponsor this event?

Thanks,

Jeri